Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Back

Political Attack Ads Leverage AI in U.S. Election Campaign

Doron Ish Shalom
,
Head of BizDev & Strategic Partnerships
April 26, 2023

AI’s Growing Role in Political Campaigns

AI-powered tools have rapidly become integral to modern political campaigns, streamlining operations and enhancing voter engagement. Campaigns are using AI for tasks such as identifying fundraising audiences, generating written content like advertisements and emails, and analyzing voter behavior to refine their strategies.

For example, during the 2022 midterm elections, campaigns employed AI to optimize fundraising efforts. The Republican National Committee (RNC) provided a striking example of AI’s potential with its April 2023 attack ad targeting President Joe Biden.

Released moments after Biden announced his reelection campaign, the ad used AI-generated imagery to depict a dystopian future under a second Biden-Harris term.

Simulated scenes included explosions in Taiwan, migrants overwhelming the southern border, and police patrolling San Francisco streets. While effective in grabbing attention, this ad also highlighted the ethical dilemmas surrounding AI in politics.

 

The Ethical and Legal Challenges of AI in Politics

An alarming aspect of AI in political campaigns is its ability to produce hyper-realistic but entirely fabricated content. Deepfakes—AI-generated videos, audio clips, or images that mimic real people—are particularly concerning.

In one notable case ahead of New Hampshire’s January 2024 primary, a political consultant created a robocall featuring an AI-generated voice that sounded like President Biden, urging voters not to participate. The consultant now faces criminal charges for voter suppression.

Deepfakes are not new; manipulated content has been circulating for years. In 2018, a fake video showed Barack Obama insulting Donald Trump, while an altered image from 2004 falsely depicted John Kerry at an anti-war protest with Jane Fonda. However, the rapid advancement of generative AI tools has made creating such content easier and more convincing than ever before.

 

Legal Gray Areas 

The legal landscape surrounding AI-generated political content remains murky. Existing U.S. election laws prohibit fraudulent misrepresentation of candidates but do not explicitly address AI-generated materials. Efforts to regulate deepfakes have faced resistance due to concerns about free speech under the First Amendment.

For instance, Republicans on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) blocked a proposal to extend oversight to AI-created depictions. Meanwhile, Democrats have urged the FEC to crack down on misleading uses of AI, arguing that the technology enables a new level of deception capable of misleading voters on a massive scale.

Internationally, some progress has been made. The European Union’s Digital Services Act imposes transparency requirements on tech platforms and could serve as a model for U.S. regulations. However, without clear federal legislation in the United States, campaigns are left grappling with how to address these challenges independently.

 

How Campaigns and Tech Companies Are Responding

Recognizing the risks posed by AI-generated disinformation, President Biden’s reelection campaign has taken proactive steps by forming a task force called the “Social Media, AI, Mis/Disinformation (SAID) Legal Advisory Group.” This group is preparing legal strategies to counteract deepfakes and other forms of disinformation by drafting court filings and exploring existing laws that could be applied against deceptive content.

The task force aims to create a “legal toolkit” that can respond swiftly to various scenarios involving misinformation. For example, it is exploring how voter protection laws or even international regulations could be leveraged against malicious actors using AI-generated content.

Legislative Efforts

Lawmakers are beginning to address the issue as well. A bipartisan Senate bill co-sponsored by Amy Klobuchar and Josh Hawley seeks to ban materially deceptive deepfakes related to federal candidates while allowing exceptions for parody or satire. Another proposal would require disclaimers on election ads featuring AI-generated content.

Although progress has been slow, these legislative efforts reflect growing recognition of the need for guardrails around AI in politics.

As AI-generated content becomes more sophisticated and accessible, organizations face many of the same challenges confronting political campaigns. The ability to create convincing but fabricated content poses significant risks to brand reputation, customer trust, and information integrity across all sectors.

Effective responses will likely require a multi-faceted approach combining technical solutions, policy frameworks, and stakeholder education. Detection capabilities remain important but insufficient alone, particularly as generative AI continues to advance. Organizations should consider establishing clear policies regarding the use and disclosure of AI-generated content while building incident response protocols specifically designed for synthetic media threats.

At Clarity, we recognize that protecting against deepfakes requires both technical expertise and organizational preparedness. By analyzing developments in high-profile domains like politics, we continuously refine our detection systems to address emerging techniques that malicious actors might repurpose for attacks against enterprises and institutions.

‍

Latest AI Deepfake articles

Deepfake Investment Scams Are Exploding—And the Stakes Just Got Personal

Over the past few weeks, my feed has been flooded with "exclusive" video pitches featuring familiar faces like Gal Gadot, Dovi Frances, Yasmin Lukatz, Eyal Valdman, and even Warren Buffett. Each video promises extraordinary returns from a supposedly exclusive investment fund. The presentations are incredibly polished, flawlessly lip-synced, and convincingly authentic.

The only problem? None of these videos are real.

Why Does This Matter?

  • Hyper-Realism on Demand: Advanced generative AI now easily replicates faces, voices, and micro-expressions in real-time.
  • Massive Reach: Fraudsters distribute thousands of micro-targeted ads across Instagram, YouTube Shorts, and TikTok. Removing one only leads to a rapid replacement.
  • Record Losses: In 2024, a deepfake impersonation of a CFO cost a UK engineering firm $25 million. Regulators estimate nearly 40% of last year's investment fraud complaints involved manipulated audio or video.

What To Watch For

  • Too-Good-To-Be-True Promises: Genuine celebrities rarely endorse 15% daily returns.
  • One-Way Communication: Disabled comments, invitation-only direct messages, and suspiciously new "official" websites are red flags.
  • Subtle Visual Artifacts: Watch for flat hairline lighting, inconsistent blinking patterns, or an unnatural stare when the speaker moves.

How Clarity Responds

At Clarity, our detection engine swiftly identified the recent "Gal Gadot investment pitch" deepfake within 4 seconds, pinpointing subtle lip-sync inconsistencies invisible to human observers.

As deepfakes proliferate at machine speed, automated verification is essential. Our technology analyzes facial dynamics, audio patterns, and metadata in real-time, enabling rapid removal of fraudulent content—before it reaches potential victims. Think of our solution as antivirus software for the age of synthetic media—always active, continuously evolving, and most effective when supported by an educated public.

Yet, technology alone isn't enough; critical thinking and vigilance remain crucial.

If You Encounter a Suspicious Investment Video:

  • Pause: Don’t act immediately.
  • Verify: Confirm the source through known, official channels.
  • Report: Use the “impersonation” option available on most platforms.
  • Share Awareness: Inform others. Community awareness grows faster than deepfake scams when actively spread.
Together, let's protect our communities—investors, families, and fans alike—from synthetic media fraud.
‍
graphical user interface, website

‍

Last week, Unit42 by Palo Alto Networks published a fascinating - and frightening - deep dive into how easily threat actors are creating synthetic identities to infiltrate organizations.

We’re talking about AI-generated personas, complete with fake resumes, social profiles, and most notably, deepfaked video interviews. These attackers aren’t just sending phishing emails anymore. They’re showing up on your video calls, looking and sounding like the perfect candidate.

At Clarity, this is exactly the kind of threat we’ve been preparing for.

The Rise of Deepfakes in Hiring - A New Attack Vector

The interview process has become a weak link in organizational security. With remote hiring now standard, verifying a candidate’s identity has never been more challenging - and adversaries know it.

Deepfake technology has reached a point where bad actors can spin up convincing video personas in hours. As Unit42 highlighted, state-sponsored groups are already exploiting this to gain insider access to critical infrastructure, data, and intellectual property.

This isn’t just a cybersecurity issue - it’s a trust crisis.

‍

Inside Unit42’s Findings - A Manual Deepfake Hunt

In their detailed analysis, Unit42 showcased just how layered and complex synthetic identity attacks can be. Each figure in their report highlights different aspects of deepfake deception - from AI-generated profile photos and fabricated resumes to manipulated video interviews, with cheap and widely available hardware to higher-quality deepfakes using resource-intensive techniques.

Their approach demonstrates the painstaking process of manually dissecting these fakes:

  • Spotting subtle visual glitches

  • Identifying inconsistencies across frames

  • Cross-referencing digital footprints

While their expertise is impressive, it also underscores a critical point: most organizations don’t have the time, resources, or deepfake specialists to conduct this level of forensic analysis for every candidate or call.

That’s exactly why Clarity exists.

‍

How Clarity Detects What the Human Eye Can’t

Let’s face it - no recruiter, hiring manager, or IT admin can be expected to spot a high-quality deepfake in a live interview. That’s where Clarity comes in.

Our AI-powered detection platform is designed to seamlessly analyze video feeds, pre-recorded interviews, and live calls to identify synthetic media in real-time.

When we ran the videos shared in Unit42’s report through our Clarity Studio, the outcome was clear:

Deepfake detected - with a clear confidence score that tells you instantly whether a video is real or synthetic. No need for manual checks or deepfake expertise - Clarity delivers fast, decisive answers when it matters most.

No manual frame-by-frame reviews. No specialized training required. Just fast, reliable detection that integrates directly into your workflows.

‍

Automating Trust in a Synthetic World

At Clarity, we believe organizations shouldn’t have to become deepfake experts to stay protected. Whether you're hiring globally, conducting sensitive interviews, or verifying identities remotely, our system ensures:

  • Real-time detection during live calls

  • Comprehensive analysis of recorded videos

  • Automated alerts when synthetic media is detected

With Clarity, you can focus on growing your team and business, without second-guessing who’s really on the other side of the screen.

See It In Action

We applaud Unit42 for shedding light on this growing threat. To demonstrate how proactive detection can neutralize these risks, we’ve analyzed the same deepfake videos from their post using Clarity Studio.

Check out the screenshots below to see how Clarity instantly flags these synthetic identities - before they become your next insider threat.

Our studio results on Unit42 Figure 4 video: A demonstration of a realtime deepfake on cheap and widely-available hardware

‍

Our studio results on Unit42 Figure 4 video: A demonstration of a realtime deepfake on cheap and widely-available hardware
Our studio results on Unit42 Figure 5: demonstration of identity switching
Our studio results on Unit42 Figure 6. A higher quality deepfake using a more resource-intensive technique
Our studio results on Unit42 Figure 7c. The "sky-or-ground"

‍

On Saturday night, Israeli Channel 14 mistakenly aired a manipulated video of former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant—an AI-generated deepfake that appeared to originate from Iranian media sources. The incident, which took place during the channel’s evening newscast, showcased Gallant speaking in Hebrew but with a clear Persian accent. The anchor, recognizing the suspicious nature of the clip, interrupted the broadcast mid-sentence, calling out the video as fabricated.

“On the first sentence I said stop the video. We apologize. This is cooked… These are not Gallant’s words but AI trying to insert messages about the U.S. and the Houthis,” said anchor Sarah Beck live on air.

Shortly after, Channel 14 issued an official statement confirming that the video was aired without prior verification and that an internal investigation was underway.

What Actually Happened?

The video portrayed Gallant stating that “the U.S. will not be able to defeat the Houthis,” a politically charged statement intended to sow confusion and manipulate public sentiment. Although the channel removed the clip within seconds, the damage was already done: the AI-generated video had reached thousands of viewers.

This incident highlights the speed, sophistication, and geopolitical implications of deepfake attacks.

How Clarity Responded — in Real Time

Minutes after the clip aired, our team at Clarity ran the footage through Clarity Studio, our real-time media analysis and deepfake detection platform. The results were clear:

  • Manipulation Level: High
  • Audio-Visual Inconsistencies: Detected in voice pattern and facial dynamics
  • Anomaly Source: Synthetic voice generation with foreign accent simulation

Here’s the detection screenshot from Clarity Studio:

We identified clear mismatches between Gallant’s known voice and speech pattern compared to the clip, along with temporal inconsistencies in facial movement and audio syncing—hallmarks of state-sponsored deepfake manipulation.

Why It Matters

This wasn’t a fringe incident. This was a high-profile deception attempt broadcast on national television. Deepfakes are no longer future threats. They are present-day weapons—used to spread disinformation, manipulate public opinion, and erode trust in media.

And this time, Clarity caught it before the narrative could spiral out of control.

The Takeaway

Broadcasters, law enforcement, and government agencies need tools that can verify audio and video authenticity in real time. This isn’t just about technology—it’s about safeguarding democratic discourse and preventing psychological operations from hostile actors.

At Clarity, we’re building the tools to detect these threats before they become headlines.

‍

Changpeng Zhao (CZ) of Binance recently warned, deepfakes are proliferating in the crypto space, impersonating prominent figures to promote scams and fraudulent projects. The message is clear: the digital age has ushered in a new era of brand vulnerability.

Deepfakes, powered by sophisticated artificial intelligence, manipulate audio and video to create convincing forgeries. The technology's accessibility and affordability have democratized its use, making it easier for malicious actors to create realistic impersonations.

In the financial and crypto sectors, where trust is paramount, deepfakes can cause substantial damage. Impersonating CEOs, creating fake endorsements, and fabricating promotional materials are just a few of the tactics being employed. The potential for financial damage is substantial, as unsuspecting individuals are tricked into sending money or divulging sensitive information.

Consider the recent surge in deepfakes impersonating public figures endorsing cryptocurrency scams. These fabricated videos, often spread through social media, can deceive even savvy investors.

Brand And Financial Consequences

The consequences are concerning, leading to substantial financial losses and a severe erosion of trust in the affected brands.

The impact on brand reputation can be significant. Deepfakes can tarnish a brand's image overnight, eroding the credibility built over years. Regaining trust after a deepfake incident is an uphill battle, requiring a concerted effort to restore public confidence. In a digital world where information spreads quickly, the damage can be extensive and long-lasting.

However, there are strategies for mitigating and preventing deepfake attacks. Technological solutions are at the forefront of this battle. Deepfake detection tools, powered by AI, can analyze videos and audio to identify telltale signs of manipulation. 

Blockchain technology offers another layer of protection, providing a secure and transparent way to verify identity and content. Watermarking and digital signatures can also help authenticate media and prevent tampering.

A Technological Arms Race

The deepfake threat isn't static; it's a rapidly evolving landscape. The technology itself is constantly being refined, with advancements in AI and machine learning pushing the boundaries of what's possible. 

This evolution is driven by a technological arms race. As detection tools improve, so do the methods used to create deepfakes. Generative adversarial networks (GANs), for instance, are becoming more sophisticated, allowing for the creation of highly realistic synthetic content. 

Furthermore, the accessibility of powerful computing resources and open-source deepfake software democratizes the technology, placing it within reach of even less technically skilled individuals.

This constant evolution presents a significant challenge for detection and mitigation efforts. It's not simply a matter of developing a one-size-fits-all solution; it's an ongoing battle against increasingly sophisticated techniques

-

Detection, collaboration, and information sharing are all vital in combating this evolving threat. While detection and prevention should be the first port of call, collaboration with law enforcement and regulatory agencies can help bring deepfake creators to justice.

‍

 

‍